Signatures

[Erik Frèrejean]

As its a design decision by the phpBB devs. If you feel it is a bug you are of course free to submit a ticket to the bugtracker. But I expect it to be closed soon, as "no signature permissions" naturally means that you can't define one.

[mpg187 MPG]

I don't mean that being a bug, I mean this:

There is a bug in php where say if I make 20 posts then define a signature and post more, the first 20 posts will not show my signature. Only 21+ will.

[Erik Frèrejean]

How is this a php bug? PHP doesn't do anything with signatures, phpBB on the other hand handles this correctly

[mpg187 MPG]

I meant phpbb, if you make a sig after posting it doesn't show up

[Erik Frèrejean]

Have you even checked this?
Your first post contains a signature, which you obviously have set after the first post due to the "newly registered users" permissions. Hence signatures are handled correctly even when you set the sig after posting

[mpg187 MPG]

Have you even checked this?
Your first post contains a signature, which you obviously have set after the first post due to the "newly registered users" permissions. Hence signatures are handled correctly even when you set the sig after posting

my fist post contains my signature because I edited it adter I made one

[Erik Frèrejean]

If you feel it is a bug you are of course free to submit a ticket to the bugtracker.

There really isn't an STG support issue here.

[mpg187 MPG]

It was at first when I was asking why I couldn't make a sig here, but ya the part about the bug isnt

[..::Frans::..]

posting without my signature

[..::Frans::..]

and one with.....

@Erik: it IS possible to post with and without signature...